Skip to content

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented May 22, 2023

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 22, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 22, 2023

📌 Commit 8294131 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111501 (MIR drive-by cleanups)
 - rust-lang#111609 (Mark internal functions and traits unsafe to reflect preconditions)
 - rust-lang#111612 (Give better error when collecting into `&[T]`)
 - rust-lang#111756 (Rename `{drop,forget}_{copy,ref}` lints to more consistent naming)
 - rust-lang#111843 (move lcnr to only review types stuff)
 - rust-lang#111844 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d935d0d into rust-lang:master May 22, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 22, 2023
@lcnr lcnr deleted the rm-lcnr branch May 23, 2023 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants