Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

ojeda and others added 20 commits April 24, 2023 01:56
…m_handling`

`tests/run-make/alloc-no-oom-handling` tests that `alloc` under
`no_global_oom_handling` builds and is warning-free.

Do the same for `core` to prevent issues such as [1].

Link: rust-lang#110649 [1]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Fixes rust-lang#35785 by converting non UTF-8 linker output to Unicode using the OEM code page.

Before:

```text
  = note: Non-UTF-8 output: LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file \'m\x84rchenhaft.obj\'\r\n
```

After:

```text
   = note: LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'märchenhaft.obj'

```

The difference is more dramatic if using a non-ascii language pack for Visual Studio.
I wrote these in a previous PR that I ended up withdrawing, so might as well submit them separately.
…kingjubilee

Fix Unreadable non-UTF-8 output on localized MSVC

Fixes rust-lang#35785 by converting non UTF-8 linker output to Unicode using the OEM code page.

Before:

```text
  = note: Non-UTF-8 output: LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file \'m\x84rchenhaft.obj\'\r\n
```

After:

```text
   = note: LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'märchenhaft.obj'
```

The difference is more dramatic if using a non-ascii language pack for Windows.
…test, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Add test for warning-free builds of `core` under `no_global_oom_handling`

`tests/run-make/alloc-no-oom-handling` tests that `alloc` under `no_global_oom_handling` builds and is warning-free.

Do the same for `core` to prevent issues such as [1].

Link: rust-lang#110649 [1]
…tic-note, r=compiler-errors

improve error notes for packed struct reference diagnostic

Addresses rust-lang#110199
Move most rustdoc-ui tests into subdirectories

This makes it easier to know where to add a new test, and makes the top-level directory less overwhelming.
…riddle

rustdoc: Get `repr` information through `AdtDef` for foreign items

As suggested by `@notriddle,` this approach works too. The only downside is that the display of the original attribute isn't kept, but I think it's an acceptable downside.

r? `@notriddle`
…ompiler-errors

Do not resolve anonymous lifetimes in consts to be static.

Fixes rust-lang#110931
…e8472

Improve internal field comments on `slice::Iter(Mut)`

I wrote these in a previous PR that I ended up withdrawing, so might as well submit them separately.

`@bors` rollup=always
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 29, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 29, 2023

📌 Commit f720813 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 29, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2023

⌛ Testing commit f720813 with merge d3edfd1...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing d3edfd1 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 30, 2023
@bors bors merged commit d3edfd1 into rust-lang:master Apr 30, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 30, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#110997 885dff688ec31558afbd6886cfbc8dd0859951bf
#110984 1dd289c5e9bc9e0ecb160863bade6e5000f09841
#110983 2fc5e0df8b21be5c655505155539021134dd0101
#110981 f29b389940d51ed5018ea1f998c04e63e64169a0
#110973 22ea9a30cbca03f8fe50ed62e5c58d91558a1c26
#110652 0bca678a2035f98277d55312f0bfe0787d18ce6b
#110586 4421ac881c5b914ab4d3d4701c367d4786e33ada

previous master: f5adff6bd8

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d3edfd1): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.6% [-2.6%, -2.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.0% [3.0%, 3.0%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.0% [3.0%, 3.0%] 1

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-u590scu branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.