Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jieyouxu and others added 17 commits February 14, 2023 17:31
Note that at the time of this commit, `unic-emoji-char` seems to have
data tables only up to Unicode 5.0, but Unicode is already newer than
this.

A newer emoji such as `🥺` will not be recognized as an emoji
but older emojis such as `🐱` will.
10 commits in 39c13e67a5962466cc7253d41bc1099bbcb224c3..17b3d0de0897e1c6b8ca347bd39f850bb0a5b9f6
2023-02-12 02:01:08 +0000 to 2023-02-17 19:45:09 +0000

- fix: unsupported protocol error on old macos version (rust-lang/cargo#11733)
- Error on invalid alphanumeric token for crates.io (rust-lang/cargo#11600)
- Add clippy lints (rust-lang/cargo#11722)
- chore: Make dependencies alphabetical order (rust-lang/cargo#11719)
- chore: bump mdbook to 0.4.27 (rust-lang/cargo#11716)
- Amend `mdman` tests. (rust-lang/cargo#11715)
- Run CI for macOS on nightly (rust-lang/cargo#11712)
- doc: doc comments and intra-doc links for `core::compiler` (rust-lang/cargo#11711)
- Ensure em dashes are recognizable in markup (rust-lang/cargo#11646)
- Set CARGO_BIN_NAME environment variable also for binary examples (rust-lang/cargo#11705)
Don't recover lifetimes/labels containing emojis as character literals

Fixes rust-lang#108019.

Note that at the time of this commit, `unic-emoji-char` seems to have data tables only up to Unicode 5.0, but Unicode is already newer than this.

A newer emoji such as `🥺` will not be recognized as an emoji but older emojis such as `🐱` will.

This PR leaves a couple of FIXMEs where `unic_emoji_char::is_emoji` is used.
… r=cjgillot

Don't allow evaluating queries that were fed in a previous compiler run

r? `@cjgillot`

this code was already unreachable. Also we removed the no_hash + feeding restriction in rust-lang#105220.
Don't eagerly convert principal to string

Fixes rust-lang#108155

~~I haven't yet been able to reproduce the ICE in a minimal example unfortunately.~~ Added a test
…-bound-types-r-bad, r=cjgillot

Deny non-lifetime bound vars in `for<..> ||` closure binders

Moves the check for illegal bound var types from astconv to resolve_bound_vars. If a binder is defined to have a type or const late-bound var that's not allowed, we'll resolve any usages to ty error or const error values, so we shouldn't ever see late-bound types or consts in places they aren't expected.

Fixes rust-lang#108184
Fixes rust-lang#108181
Fixes rust-lang#108192
Update cargo

10 commits in 39c13e67a5962466cc7253d41bc1099bbcb224c3..17b3d0de0897e1c6b8ca347bd39f850bb0a5b9f6 2023-02-12 02:01:08 +0000 to 2023-02-17 19:45:09 +0000

- fix: unsupported protocol error on old macos version (rust-lang/cargo#11733)
- Error on invalid alphanumeric token for crates.io (rust-lang/cargo#11600)
- Add clippy lints (rust-lang/cargo#11722)
- chore: Make dependencies alphabetical order (rust-lang/cargo#11719)
- chore: bump mdbook to 0.4.27 (rust-lang/cargo#11716)
- Amend `mdman` tests. (rust-lang/cargo#11715)
- Run CI for macOS on nightly (rust-lang/cargo#11712)
- doc: doc comments and intra-doc links for `core::compiler` (rust-lang/cargo#11711)
- Ensure em dashes are recognizable in markup (rust-lang/cargo#11646)
- Set CARGO_BIN_NAME environment variable also for binary examples (rust-lang/cargo#11705)

r? `@ghost`
link to llvm changes that prompted the special cases
@rustbot rustbot added A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Feb 18, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 18, 2023

📌 Commit 6c91efd has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 18, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 18, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 6c91efd with merge 3eb5c45...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 18, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 3eb5c45 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 18, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 3eb5c45 into rust-lang:master Feb 18, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 18, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#108205 6ae0aa9fb0c991392d7fb333b5ae0aac2d300a05
#108197 9cd9a70febedf8ae249e91b3c5dd252154c527b8
#108186 76450413c99daa2be3c1535c80b0c5279ceeae2c
#108162 331554692bdfe5f89aff524805d14d950e63b94e
#108046 3781b7ab9ea37ed7afe3b31133d7005dc2b325b0
#108031 35c3e0655130475ba185ee9660762b8a2b90ed27

previous master: 3701bdc633

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3eb5c45): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-5.3% [-5.3%, -5.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-e59onmm branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants