- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Properly check for builtin derived code #108128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| r? @jackh726 (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) | 
| Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any  Examples of  
 | 
| Should this be a rustc_* attr rather than have its own feature gate? | 
| I didn't make it  | 
cbf518c    to
    d42627f      
    Compare
  
    builtin_derived attr| Updated to check for an  @rustbot label -T-libs | 
d42627f    to
    59512d9      
    Compare
  
    59512d9    to
    90f642b      
    Compare
  
    | @bors r+ | 
| ⌛ Testing commit 90f642b with merge a56d216122f14e2cc26dffbf3304e85b2dcaee2d... | 
| 💥 Test timed out | 
| @bors retry timeout | 
| ☀️ Test successful - checks-actions | 
| Finished benchmarking commit (21e5b94): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. | 
Fixes #108122