- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
          use the correct Reveal during validation
          #105455
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | This PR changes MIR cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras | 
Reveal during validation.Reveal during validation
      b0485d5    to
    3d9641e      
    Compare
  
    3d9641e    to
    e73ef59      
    Compare
  
    | @bors r+ rollup | 
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Dec 9, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105216 (Remove unused GUI test) - rust-lang#105245 (attempt to clarify align_to docs) - rust-lang#105387 (Improve Rustdoc scrape-examples UI) - rust-lang#105389 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64le-linux) - rust-lang#105427 (Dont silently ignore rustdoc errors) - rust-lang#105442 (rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS) - rust-lang#105443 (Move some queries and methods) - rust-lang#105455 (use the correct `Reveal` during validation) - rust-lang#105470 (Clippy: backport ICE fix before beta branch) - rust-lang#105474 (lib docs: fix typo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  Aaron1011 
      pushed a commit
        to Aaron1011/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 6, 2023 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…=jackh726 use the correct `Reveal` during validation supersedes rust-lang#105454. Deals with rust-lang#105009 (comment), not closing rust-lang#105009 as the ICE may leak into beta The issue was the following: - we optimize the mir, using `Reveal::All` - some optimization relies on the hidden type of an opaque type - we then validate using `Reveal::UserFacing` again which is not able to observe the hidden type r? `@jackh726`
    
  Aaron1011 
      pushed a commit
        to Aaron1011/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 6, 2023 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105216 (Remove unused GUI test) - rust-lang#105245 (attempt to clarify align_to docs) - rust-lang#105387 (Improve Rustdoc scrape-examples UI) - rust-lang#105389 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64le-linux) - rust-lang#105427 (Dont silently ignore rustdoc errors) - rust-lang#105442 (rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS) - rust-lang#105443 (Move some queries and methods) - rust-lang#105455 (use the correct `Reveal` during validation) - rust-lang#105470 (Clippy: backport ICE fix before beta branch) - rust-lang#105474 (lib docs: fix typo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
supersedes #105454. Deals with #105009 (comment), not closing #105009 as the ICE may leak into beta
The issue was the following:
Reveal::AllReveal::UserFacingagain which causes us to use the opaque type again, e.g. fromfn_sig, causing a type error when relating it with the hidden type.r? @jackh726