Check dyn* return type correctly
#104508
Merged
Check dyn* return type correctly
#104508
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @oli-obk (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2022
Check `dyn*` return type correctly In `check_fn`, if the declared return type is `dyn Trait`, then we check the return type separately to produce better diagnostics, because this is never valid -- however, when `dyn*` was introduced, this check was never adjusted to only account for *unsized* `dyn Trait` and not *sized* `dyn* Trait`. Fixes rust-lang#104501
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2022
Check `dyn*` return type correctly In `check_fn`, if the declared return type is `dyn Trait`, then we check the return type separately to produce better diagnostics, because this is never valid -- however, when `dyn*` was introduced, this check was never adjusted to only account for *unsized* `dyn Trait` and not *sized* `dyn* Trait`. Fixes rust-lang#104501
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2022
Check `dyn*` return type correctly In `check_fn`, if the declared return type is `dyn Trait`, then we check the return type separately to produce better diagnostics, because this is never valid -- however, when `dyn*` was introduced, this check was never adjusted to only account for *unsized* `dyn Trait` and not *sized* `dyn* Trait`. Fixes rust-lang#104501
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103852 (Don't remap early-bound regions for return-position `impl Trait` in trait originating from `impl`) - rust-lang#104366 (Simplify settings theme choice) - rust-lang#104433 (Fix `emit_unused_delims_expr` ICE) - rust-lang#104444 (Fix ICE in in_operand for ty error) - rust-lang#104483 (Convert predicates into Predicate in the Obligation constructor) - rust-lang#104496 (Don't attempt to normalize compiler backtraces) - rust-lang#104503 (rustdoc: remove redundant font-color CSS on `.where`) - rust-lang#104508 (Check `dyn*` return type correctly) - rust-lang#104515 (ICE fixing, remove is_tainted_by_errors since we have ty_error for delay bug) - rust-lang#104532 (Migrate tooltip style to CSS variables) - rust-lang#104545 (Readd the matches_macro diag item) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In
check_fn, if the declared return type isdyn Trait, then we check the return type separately to produce better diagnostics, because this is never valid -- however, whendyn*was introduced, this check was never adjusted to only account for unsizeddyn Traitand not sizeddyn* Trait.Fixes #104501