-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 13.9k
Coherence negative impls implied bounds #100888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coherence negative impls implied bounds #100888
Conversation
3cd2502 to
c66ef3f
Compare
|
Rebased on top of #99702 which has removed |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100904) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
c66ef3f to
4da14ef
Compare
|
Rebased on top of master as #100789 is already merged, so this is now ready. |
|
@bors rollup |
|
Looks like lcnr already reviewed, but r+ from me, too. |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#99993 (linker: Update some outdated comments) - rust-lang#100220 (Properly forward `ByRefSized::fold` to the inner iterator) - rust-lang#100826 (sugg: take into count the debug formatting) - rust-lang#100855 (Extra documentation for new formatting feature) - rust-lang#100888 (Coherence negative impls implied bounds) - rust-lang#100901 (Make some methods private) - rust-lang#100906 (Suggest alternatives when trying to mutate a `HashMap`/`BTreeMap` via indexing) - rust-lang#100912 (Diagnose missing includes in run-make tests) - rust-lang#100919 (Use par_body_owners for liveness) - rust-lang#100922 (Rewrite error index generator to greatly reduce the size of the pages) - rust-lang#100926 (Update README.md) - rust-lang#100930 (Use `--userns=keep-id` when "docker" is really podman) - rust-lang#100938 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS rule) - rust-lang#100940 (Do not suggest adding a bound to a opaque type) - rust-lang#100945 (Add a missing test case for impl generic mismatch) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fixes #93875
This PR is rebased on top of #100789 and it would need to include that one which is already r+ed.
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @lcnr (which I've talked about 3222f42, I guess after you finish your reordering of modules and work with OutlivesEnvironmentEnv this commit can just be reverted).