-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 13.9k
Open
Labels
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCS-tracking-design-concernsStatus: There are blocking design concerns.Status: There are blocking design concerns.S-tracking-needs-to-bakeStatus: The implementation is "complete" but it needs time to bake.Status: The implementation is "complete" but it needs time to bake.T-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language team
Description
This is a tracking issue for the target_has_atomic_equal_alignment CFG flag which was added in #76965 for Atomic*::from_mut.
It indicates whether an AtomicX has the same alignment as the equivalent X integer type. On some 32-bit platforms (e.g. x86) AtomicI64 has an alignment of 8 while i64 is only aligned to 4 bytes.
Potential design concerns:
- Open question of whether a dedicated cfg is necessary over cfg(accessible) on the from_mut method specifically, which is what is currently gated on this cfg
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCS-tracking-design-concernsStatus: There are blocking design concerns.Status: There are blocking design concerns.S-tracking-needs-to-bakeStatus: The implementation is "complete" but it needs time to bake.Status: The implementation is "complete" but it needs time to bake.T-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language team