Skip to content

Conversation

smoelius
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #9256

changelog: none

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @llogiq

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 29, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small nit pick, otherwise this looks good.

} else {
"&"
};
if n_needed_derefs == 0 && needed_ref.is_empty() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about a needs_ref instead of a needed_ref so we don't need an is_empty() here?

@smoelius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hopefully, I understood correctly. Thanks for reviewing, @llogiq.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 19, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #9349) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Aug 21, 2022

Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for being absent for a while. r=me after rebase.

@smoelius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebase done. Thanks again, @llogiq.

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Aug 22, 2022

Thank you!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2022

📌 Commit 0bc26c8 has been approved by llogiq

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 0bc26c8 with merge 5735a3b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing 5735a3b to master...

@bors bors merged commit 5735a3b into rust-lang:master Aug 22, 2022
@smoelius smoelius deleted the fix-9256 branch August 22, 2022 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect suggested removal of to_string on slice
4 participants