Skip to content

Conversation

xFrednet
Copy link
Contributor

@xFrednet xFrednet commented Dec 6, 2022

This fixes the last issues from #9664 as the author seems to be inactive. The PR author was sadly kept during the rebase, due to the conflict resolution.

IDK if it's worth it do to a full review, I only added the last commit, everything else remained the same, besides a rebase.


changelog: Sugg: [cast_possible_truncation]: Now suggests using try_from or allowing the lint
#10038

closes: #9231

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 6, 2022

r? @Jarcho

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Dec 6, 2022
@xFrednet xFrednet force-pushed the 9231-sugg-try-from branch 2 times, most recently from dc887c5 to cf5db9a Compare December 6, 2022 18:07
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple of edge cases noted. Otherwise LGTM.

@xFrednet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good points! I've rebased, since it has been over a month. All changes are in the last commit, as well as a test for the as u32 as u16 expression.

Thank you for your patience, when it came to the update :)

@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

Jarcho commented Jan 14, 2023

Thank you. @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2023

📌 Commit 5cb6246 has been approved by Jarcho

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 5cb6246 with merge 483b7ac...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Jarcho
Pushing 483b7ac to master...

@bors bors merged commit 483b7ac into rust-lang:master Jan 14, 2023
@xFrednet xFrednet deleted the 9231-sugg-try-from branch January 14, 2023 17:47
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

I am a bit surprised that this was marked as closing #9231; at least I don't see a test for usize-to-u64 casts here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Have a lint against usize-to-u64 casts (or, against *all* integer casts)
6 participants