Skip to content

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Should resolve #12600

Not sure why I thought the Rust version was the same as on beta, that's never the case (but future nightly changes can break the ABI again).

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2022

📌 Commit 6cb0746 has been approved by jonas-schievink

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 6cb0746 with merge ee2d5fe...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jonas-schievink
Pushing ee2d5fe to master...

@bors bors merged commit ee2d5fe into rust-lang:master Jul 18, 2022
@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jul 18, 2022

I wonder if we could start trimming these down at some point.

@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink deleted the proc-macro-abi-1.64 branch July 18, 2022 12:50
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, opened #12798 to remove some older ABIs

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
//! Macro ABI for version 1.63 of rustc
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't that read 1.64?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, removed it in #12802

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Proc macro server crashed
4 participants