Skip to content

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Feb 20, 2020

Together with [1] this fixes rust-lang/rust#54434. For the same reason optimistically define HAVE_KERN_PROC_ARGS on NetBSD (untested by me though).

To have any effect this requires [1,2].

[1] ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace@0f06cda
[2] rust-lang/libbacktrace#1

For the same reason define HAVE_KERN_PROC_ARGS on NetBSD.

This depends on having [1] available in libbacktrace.

[1] ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace@0f06cda
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

To make sure I understand, this needs extra commits in libbacktrace right? If so the submodule here will need an update before merging this.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Feb 20, 2020

Yes, it needs ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace@0f06cda which is not yet in rust-lang-nursery/libbacktrace.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Ah ok, then this will need to include a submodule update as well to get merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

backtraces have blank lines and <unknown> instead of function names on FreeBSD
3 participants