New sample_int_linter

[MichaelChirico]

Part of #884

No hits on our package.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (984a399) 99.63% compared to head (9f93dbb) 99.64%.

❗ Current head 9f93dbb differs from pull request most recent head a3bceb7. Consider uploading reports for the commit a3bceb7 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2274   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.63%   99.64%           
=======================================
  Files         114      115    +1     
  Lines        5258     5290   +32     
=======================================
+ Hits         5239     5271   +32     
  Misses         19       19           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[AshesITR]

Maybe add some metadata tests?

[MichaelChirico]

Maybe add some metadata tests?

Thanks; done. I guess we could discuss whether to land on {s}ample(1: or sample({1}:. Pretty much a toss-up to me.

[AshesITR]

I'd expect to land on the call to sample().