Skip to content

Mark places that would use XPath2.0+ features with TODO #2453

@MichaelChirico

Description

@MichaelChirico
          Add a TODO referencing the XPath 2.0 issue?

Originally posted by @AshesITR in #2433 (comment)

Now that #2366 is filed, it's preferable for comments to point to that issue instead of vaguely refer to things about XPath1.0 vs 2.0. After #2149, this will also be a mechanism to ensure related issues are handled at the appropriate time, too.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    internalsIssues related to inner workings of lintr, i.e., not user-visible

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions