Skip to content

Conversation

pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #13795 by @Ninja91
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Ninja91/8/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Ninja91/8/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Ninja91/8/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

Pull Request resolved: #13795

Add 16A8W quantization support and test for the mul operation in ExecutorTorch ARM backend.

This follows the pattern established for linear operations, extending int16 support to mul operations.

Changes:
- Add INT16 dtype validation support in op_mul.py
- Add test_mul_tensor_16a8w_tosa_INT test function
- Enable test_mul.py in test targets configuration

The 16A8W configuration uses 16-bit activations with 8-bit weights, enabling higher precision for activations while maintaining weight efficiency.
ghstack-source-id: 308923221
@exported-using-ghexport
@bypass-github-export-checks
@bypass-github-pytorch-ci-checks
@bypass-github-executorch-ci-checks

Differential Revision: [D80510628](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80510628/)
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/14196

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 27 Pending

As of commit a0083ea with merge base 4f414d7 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Sep 11, 2025
Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@Ninja91 Ninja91 self-requested a review September 11, 2025 04:57
@Ninja91 Ninja91 merged commit fe9447e into main Sep 11, 2025
112 of 121 checks passed
@Ninja91 Ninja91 deleted the gh/Ninja91/8/orig branch September 11, 2025 04:59
StrycekSimon pushed a commit to nxp-upstream/executorch that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2025
)

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into
the main branch.
ghstack PR number: pytorch#13795 by
@Ninja91
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments,
and reviews
ghstack PR base:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Ninja91/8/base
ghstack PR head:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Ninja91/8/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Ninja91/8/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

Co-authored-by: Nitin Jain <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants