Skip to content

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 4, 2022

Converting a large enough int to a decimal string raises ValueError as expected. However, the raise comes after the quadratic-time base-conversion algorithm has run to completion. For effective DOS prevention, we need some kind of check before entering the quadratic-time loop. Oops! =)

The quick fix: essentially we catch most values that exceed the threshold up front. Those that slip through will still be on the small side (read: sufficiently fast), and will get caught by the existing check so that the limit remains exact.

The justification for the current check. The C code check is:

max_str_digits / (3 * PyLong_SHIFT) <= (size_a - 11) / 10

In GitHub markdown math-speak, writing $M$ for max_str_digits, $L$ for PyLong_SHIFT and $s$ for size_a, that check is:
$$\left\lfloor\frac{M}{3L}\right\rfloor \le \left\lfloor\frac{s - 11}{10}\right\rfloor$$

From this it follows that
$$\frac{M}{3L} &lt; \frac{s-1}{10}$$
hence that
$$\frac{L(s-1)}{M} &gt; \frac{10}{3} &gt; \log_2(10).$$
So
$$2^{L(s-1)} &gt; 10^M.$$
But our input integer $a$ satisfies $|a| \ge 2^{L(s-1)}$, so $|a|$ is larger than $10^M$. This shows that we don't accidentally capture anything below the intended limit in the check.

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith [Google LLC] [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit b126196)

Co-authored-by: Mark Dickinson [email protected]

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead

…GH-96537)

Converting a large enough `int` to a decimal string raises `ValueError` as expected. However, the raise comes _after_ the quadratic-time base-conversion algorithm has run to completion. For effective DOS prevention, we need some kind of check before entering the quadratic-time loop. Oops! =)

The quick fix: essentially we catch _most_ values that exceed the threshold up front. Those that slip through will still be on the small side (read: sufficiently fast), and will get caught by the existing check so that the limit remains exact.

The justification for the current check. The C code check is:
```c
max_str_digits / (3 * PyLong_SHIFT) <= (size_a - 11) / 10
```

In GitHub markdown math-speak, writing $M$ for `max_str_digits`, $L$ for `PyLong_SHIFT` and $s$ for `size_a`, that check is:
$$\left\lfloor\frac{M}{3L}\right\rfloor \le \left\lfloor\frac{s - 11}{10}\right\rfloor$$

From this it follows that
$$\frac{M}{3L} < \frac{s-1}{10}$$
hence that
$$\frac{L(s-1)}{M} > \frac{10}{3} > \log_2(10).$$
So
$$2^{L(s-1)} > 10^M.$$
But our input integer $a$ satisfies $|a| \ge 2^{L(s-1)}$, so $|a|$ is larger than $10^M$. This shows that we don't accidentally capture anything _below_ the intended limit in the check.

<!-- gh-issue-number: pythongh-95778 -->
* Issue: pythongh-95778
<!-- /gh-issue-number -->

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith [Google LLC] <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b126196)

Co-authored-by: Mark Dickinson <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌.

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 8a776d1 into python:3.11 Sep 4, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-b126196-3.11 branch September 4, 2022 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-blocker skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error type-security A security issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants