-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
test cli steps parsing #1833
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test cli steps parsing #1833
Changes from 2 commits
f6949c9
73b4937
a8ae036
f5a6cea
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ | ||||
| const test = require('tape'); | ||||
| const cli = require('../../src/cli'); | ||||
| const stdout = require('./util/readConsole').stdout; | ||||
| const stderr = require('./util/readConsole').stderr; | ||||
|
|
||||
| test('testing steps parsing', async function (t) { | ||||
|
||||
| "test-cli": "node test/cli/*.js | tap-spec", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth running it without async first to just see if the issue is related just to that?
and we're sure tape does async?
Tape works in async though it still fails, apparently cli function doesn't return a promise so there's no point of async/await anyway.
i notice the package.json config pipes the output to tape-spec, do we need to do that?
It's just a prettified/formatted output of the tape report, it shouldn't interfere with the output. But I tried it out without it and I am still facing same issues :(
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| function ReadLog(stream) { | ||
| this._stream = stream; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ReadLog.prototype.read = function(options) { | ||
|
|
||
| let output = []; | ||
| let stream = this._stream; | ||
|
|
||
| let originalStreamWrite = stream.write; | ||
| stream.write = function(string) { | ||
| output.push(string); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| output: output, | ||
| restore: function() { | ||
| stream.write = originalStreamWrite; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| exports.stdout = new ReadLog(process.stdout); | ||
| exports.stderr = new ReadLog(process.stderr); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks ok, compared to
image-sequencer/test/cli/saveSequence.js
Lines 1 to 2 in 3b8181a