Skip to content

Conversation

jrfnl
Copy link
Collaborator

@jrfnl jrfnl commented Apr 5, 2022

This safeguards and documents the current behaviour of the method.

Includes removing redundant conditional in the original method.

@jrfnl jrfnl added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Apr 5, 2022
@jrfnl jrfnl requested a review from grogy April 5, 2022 11:21
@jrfnl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jrfnl commented Apr 5, 2022

Build failure is unrelated to this PR. See #116

I will rebase this PR to show a passing build once PR #116 has been merged and cherrypicked to the develop branch.

@jrfnl jrfnl removed the request for review from grogy April 5, 2022 11:50
@jrfnl jrfnl marked this pull request as draft April 5, 2022 11:50
Copy link
Member

@grogy grogy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect messages for parsing. Thank you

@grogy grogy marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2022 07:34
@grogy
Copy link
Member

grogy commented Apr 8, 2022

Can you please rebase this PR? After I can merge it :-)

This safeguards and documents the current behaviour of the method.

Includes removing redundant conditional in the original method.
@jrfnl jrfnl force-pushed the feature/new-test-syntax-error-getline branch from c9fdc8b to 0b202ec Compare April 8, 2022 11:43
@jrfnl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jrfnl commented Apr 8, 2022

Rebased without changes.

@grogy grogy merged commit 986f18d into develop Apr 8, 2022
@grogy grogy deleted the feature/new-test-syntax-error-getline branch April 8, 2022 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants