Skip to content

Conversation

sujil02
Copy link
Contributor

@sujil02 sujil02 commented Aug 27, 2021

Adding sort to reorder webhookDescription based on webhookType
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDK-1916

#5022
Signed-off-by: sujil02 [email protected]

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sujil02,

For we are able to merge your contribution you need to:

@sujil02
Copy link
Contributor Author

sujil02 commented Aug 30, 2021

Hi @sujil02,

For we are able to merge your contribution you need to:

Done.

@sujil02 sujil02 requested a review from camilamacedo86 August 30, 2021 17:26
Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a small nit, looks good.
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 30, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2021
Copy link
Member

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2021
by sorting `webhookDescriptions` in CSV generator.

kind: bugfix
breaking: false No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit space

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit 2df56b5 into operator-framework:master Sep 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants