Skip to content

Conversation

@andrross
Copy link
Member

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for f7fe91f: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 5ba38e6: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for ad71c64: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for ad71c64: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for ad71c64: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for ad71c64: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for ad71c64: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for ad71c64: SUCCESS

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.44%. Comparing base (5799fe7) to head (ad71c64).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../src/main/java/org/opensearch/javaagent/Agent.java 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #17954      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.57%   72.44%   -0.14%     
+ Complexity    67066    66970      -96     
============================================
  Files          5470     5473       +3     
  Lines        309697   309815     +118     
  Branches      45045    45061      +16     
============================================
- Hits         224776   224447     -329     
- Misses        66602    66980     +378     
- Partials      18319    18388      +69     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andrross andrross merged commit f211d34 into opensearch-project:main Apr 17, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
@andrross andrross deleted the java-net-socket branch April 17, 2025 20:20
x-INFiN1TY-x pushed a commit to x-INFiN1TY-x/OpenSearch_Local that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2025
Harsh-87 pushed a commit to Harsh-87/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
Harsh-87 pushed a commit to Harsh-87/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants