Skip to content

Conversation

jsikstro
Copy link
Member

@jsikstro jsikstro commented Sep 22, 2025

Hello,

There are multiple cases which handle if the locality group (lgrp) id is negative (-1) in Parallel, specifically in MutableNUMASpace. -1 was historically used to indicate that the hardware topology has changed and that the lgrp id needs to be updated. This is no longer the case, since HotSpot doesn't support CPU/NUMA hotplugging, and the last piece of code setting the lgrp id to -1 was removed in JDK-8301149.

I propose we simplify the code a bit by not handling edge cases where the lgrp id is -1 and removing os::numa_has_group_homing(), which always return false

Testing:

  • Running through Oracle's tier 1-4
  • Local NUMA testing tier1-4 with -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:+UseNUMA

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368251: Parallel: Refactor lgrp_id used in MutableNUMASpace (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27424/head:pull/27424
$ git checkout pull/27424

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27424
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27424/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27424

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27424

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27424.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back jsikstro! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2025

@jsikstro This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8368251: Parallel: Refactor lgrp_id used in MutableNUMASpace

Reviewed-by: ayang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 153 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2025

@jsikstro The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 22, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Webrevs

@jsikstro
Copy link
Member Author

/label remove hotspot
/label add hotspot-gc

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2025

@jsikstro
The hotspot label was successfully removed.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc [email protected] and removed rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2025

@jsikstro
The hotspot-gc label was successfully added.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 22, 2025
Comment on lines 537 to 539
if (UseNUMA) {
int lgrp_id = os::numa_get_group_id();
if (lgrp_id != -1) {
thread->set_lgrp_id(lgrp_id);
}
thread->update_lgrp_id();
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit hesistant to remove this code from Windows since I have no way to test this. However, since we set UseNUMA = false early on initialization on Windows, Paralell should never start with NUMA enabled, so this code should effectively have no effect.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants