Skip to content

Conversation

erifan
Copy link
Contributor

@erifan erifan commented Sep 22, 2025

The VectorShape size of I_SPECIES_FOR_CAST declared in test VectorMaskCompareNotTest.java is half that of L_SPECIES_FOR_CAST. And L_SPECIES_FOR_CAST is created with the maximum shape. Therefore, if MaxVectorSize is set to 8, the shape size of I_SPECIES_FOR_CAST is 4, which is an illegal value because the minimum vector size requirement is 8 bytes.

This pull request addresses the issue by ensuring that this test runs only when MaxVectorSize is set to 16 bytes or higher.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368205: [TESTBUG] VectorMaskCompareNotTest.java crashes when MaxVectorSize=8 (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27418/head:pull/27418
$ git checkout pull/27418

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27418
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27418/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27418

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27418

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27418.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

…orSize=8

The VectorShape size of `I_SPECIES_FOR_CAST` declared in test **VectorMaskCompareNotTest.java**
is half that of `L_SPECIES_FOR_CAST`. And `L_SPECIES_FOR_CAST` is created with the maximum shape.
Therefore, if `MaxVectorSize` is set to 8, the shape size of `I_SPECIES_FOR_CAST` is 4, which
is an illegal value because the minimum vector size requirement is 8 bytes.

This pull request addresses the issue by ensuring that this test runs only when `MaxVectorSize`
 is set to 16 bytes or higher.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back erifan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2025

@erifan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 22, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant