Skip to content

FIX: Raise informative error if no t1w or t2w found #347

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024
Merged

FIX: Raise informative error if no t1w or t2w found #347

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ca99456
FIX: Raise informative error if no t1w or t2w found
scott-huberty Feb 21, 2024
e33c722
DOC: Add myself to contributors
scott-huberty Feb 21, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions nibabies/workflows/anatomical/base.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -612,6 +612,9 @@ def init_infant_single_anat_wf(
"This workflow uses only T1w or T2w inputs, but both contrasts are available."
)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@scott-huberty scott-huberty Feb 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI - I decided to place the check here, because that is where you seem to be checking for the T[1,2]w images already.

if not (t1w or t2w):
raise RuntimeError("This workflow requires either a T1w or T2w, but none were found.")

anat_files = t1w or t2w
num_files = len(anat_files)
workflow = LiterateWorkflow(name=name)
Expand Down