Skip to content

Conversation

serhalp
Copy link
Member

@serhalp serhalp commented Feb 28, 2025

Summary

Whoops. I split up a job in #7069, but it turns out if your workflow is invalid, it doesn't even report as failed. And I hadn't marked the new jobs as required yet. 🤦🏼

Note: Now that these jobs have run successfully once on this PR, I was able to mark the checks as required.

Whoops. If your workflow is invalid, it doesn't even report as failed. And I hadn't marked
the new jobs as required yet.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 28, 2025

📊 Benchmark results

Comparing with 94cb80a

  • Dependency count: 1,206 (no change)
  • Package size: 293 MB ⬇️ 0.00% decrease vs. 94cb80a
  • Number of ts-expect-error directives: 729 (no change)

@serhalp serhalp marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2025 11:55
@serhalp serhalp requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2025 11:55
Copy link
Contributor

@khendrikse khendrikse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is beautiful

@serhalp serhalp merged commit 4b63f12 into main Feb 28, 2025
51 checks passed
@serhalp serhalp deleted the ci/fix-new-format-lint-jobs branch February 28, 2025 12:14
ndhoule added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
ndhoule added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
ndhoule added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants