-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
Skip val register in ObjectBarrier impl #294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
31f6d2e
Fix compressed `val` register.
wks 0748d71
Fix for no-fast-path code paths.
wks 91f9da8
Add CI scripts
wks 065e814
Revert changes to ci-test-only-normal.sh
wks 914420c
Just set slot and target to nullptr
wks 3816fde
Fix typo
wks File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you mean "the semantics of object remembering barrier"?
We need to a check to know this is object remembering barrier somewhere in the code. We can get it from https://github.com/mmtk/mmtk-core/blob/a75309373cd301acad473bbb8ea04670facd6e2a/src/plan/plan_constraints.rs#L35, and store the value somewhere for the C++ code to access.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops. That's a typo. I did mean
ObjectBarrier.The changed code is in
mmtkObjectBarrier.cppwhich is dedicated to the object remembering barrier. The classMMTkObjectBarrierSetAssembleris only used ifget_selected_barrier()inmmtkBarrierSet.cppreturnsnew MMTkObjectBarrier();Therefore we don't need to check here, as long as theget_selected_barrier()chooses the right barrier.