Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@cremesk
Copy link
Contributor

@cremesk cremesk commented Mar 14, 2022

@clokep we both missed and forgot something in the PR #12196. ;)

@cremesk cremesk requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2022 14:50
@clokep
Copy link
Member

clokep commented Mar 14, 2022

@cremesk I don't believe this PR is correct, see a529487 (#11599) and the conversation around it:

#11599 (comment)

@cremesk
Copy link
Contributor Author

cremesk commented Mar 14, 2022

@clokep oh okay. I was so unaware of that. now I'm a little irritated myself.

@clokep
Copy link
Member

clokep commented Mar 14, 2022

@clokep oh okay. I was so unaware of that. now I'm a little irritated myself.

#11599 attempted to make bits of this clearer, but it is definitely confusing! 😢 I think being able to allow the generic worker to properly forward is the desired end-goal. For now I think I'm going to close this PR unless you can figure out a way to make this clearer?

@clokep clokep closed this Mar 14, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants