Followup on BOYP

[leseb]

🚀 Describe the new functionality needed

See the latest review from @ashwinb #1672 (review).

Mainly 2 things:

1. feat: ability to execute external providers #1672 (comment)
2. feat: ability to execute external providers #1672 (comment)

💡 Why is this needed? What if we don't build it?

Better BOYP implementation.

Other thoughts

No response

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity within 60 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs within 30 days.

[nathan-weinberg]

@cdoern is this similar to what you and I discussed about not needing the YAMLs and just using the Python code for configuration?

[cdoern]

yeah. @leseb can I be assigned to this? I am thinking of working on this issue this week

[cdoern]

unless you are already working on it!

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity within 60 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs within 30 days.

[leseb]

@cdoern are you still interested in covering this? I believe the main item is the one in the screenshot. Thanks!