Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Aug 21, 2025

Description

LCORE-390: field description for provider health status

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-390

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved API docs for provider health and readiness endpoints with clear field descriptions and examples for provider_id, status, and message.
    • Standardized example statuses to “unhealthy” where applicable.
    • Added a concrete readiness example (ready=true, empty providers list, and reason).
    • Documented a media_type field in QueryRequest for compatibility.
    • No functional changes to endpoints; updates are documentation and schema metadata only.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Documentation and schema metadata were updated for provider health/readiness. ProviderHealthStatus fields gained descriptions and examples in code and OpenAPI docs. ReadinessResponse examples were adjusted (status "unhealthy"). One model file updated to use Pydantic Field metadata. No runtime logic or endpoints changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
OpenAPI schema docs
docs/openapi.json, docs/openapi.md
Added descriptions/examples for ProviderHealthStatus fields; updated ReadinessResponse description and examples (status set to "unhealthy"); added concrete readiness example. No API surface changes.
Output docs
docs/output.md
Added descriptions for ProviderHealthStatus fields; updated readiness example status to "unhealthy"; noted a docs-only mention of QueryRequest.media_type field.
Response models (metadata)
src/models/responses.py
Switched ProviderHealthStatus fields to Pydantic Field with descriptions/examples; updated embedded example status to "unhealthy". No type/behavior changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A rabbit taps the docs with care,
Adds whispers to the fields we share.
“ok,” “unhealthy,” tales now told,
Readiness shining, crisp and bold.
No codepaths changed—just clearer skies,
I thump my foot in tidy replies. 🐇✨

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 52408e8 and 98a968c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/openapi.json (3 hunks)
  • docs/openapi.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/output.md (2 hunks)
  • src/models/responses.py (2 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
src/models/classes.txt (1)

1-12: Clarify purpose of classes.txt in src; avoid pseudo-code class declarations in source tree.

This looks like a scratchpad listing of classes rather than executable code (no imports/bodies). Keeping it under src/ may confuse tooling and reviewers. Consider either deleting it, moving it under docs/, or converting it to a short README that links to the real implementations in src/models/responses.py.

Would you like me to open a follow-up to either remove this file or relocate it to docs/?

src/models/responses.py (3)

130-141: Fix typo, improve examples, and consider constraining status values.

  • Spelling: “Optinal” → “Optional”.
  • The example for message is “ok”, which duplicates a status value; suggest a human-readable message.
  • Optional: If you intend only 'ok' | 'unhealthy' | 'not_implemented', constrain the type (Literal or Enum) so OpenAPI and validation align with docs.

Apply this minimal doc fix:

-    message: Optional[str] = Field(
-        None,
-        description="Optinal message about the health status",
-        examples=["ok"],
-    )
+    message: Optional[str] = Field(
+        None,
+        description="Optional message about the health status",
+        examples=["All systems operational", "Server is unavailable"],
+    )

If you want to enforce allowed statuses:

-from typing import Any, Optional
+from typing import Any, Optional, Literal
@@
-    status: str = Field(
+    status: Literal["ok", "unhealthy", "not_implemented"] = Field(
         description="The health status",
         examples=["ok", "unhealthy", "not_implemented"],
     )

154-165: Example uses status="Error" which conflicts with documented values.

The ReadinessResponse example sets status="Error" but ProviderHealthStatus documents 'ok' | 'unhealthy' | 'not_implemented'. Align the example or expand allowed statuses.

Suggested tweak:

-                    status="Error",
-                    message="Server is unavailable"
+                    status="unhealthy",
+                    message="Server is unavailable"

456-465: ConversationDetails docstring references ConversationSummary and a non-existent model field.

The example creates ConversationSummary(...) and references model=..., while the actual fields are last_used_model and last_used_provider, and the class is ConversationDetails.

Apply:

-        conversation = ConversationSummary(
+        conversation = ConversationDetails(
             conversation_id="123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000"
             created_at="2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
             last_message_at="2024-01-01T00:05:00Z",
             message_count=5,
-            model="gemini/gemini-2.0-flash"
+            last_used_model="gemini/gemini-2.0-flash"
         )
docs/openapi.md (1)

910-913: Fix typo in ProviderHealthStatus field description.

“Optinal” → “Optional”.

-| message |  | Optinal message about the health status |
+| message |  | Optional message about the health status |
docs/output.md (3)

77-78: Reformatting breaks markdownlint (MD055/MD056/MD058): missing trailing pipes and column counts.

The recent table edits removed trailing pipes and introduced blank rows that violate our markdownlint rules. Either reinstate trailing pipes for all tables or relax the lint rules. Given the static analysis hints, restoring pipes is the path of least resistance.

Example fix for one block (apply consistently to all affected tables):

-| 200 | Successful Response | [ModelsResponse](#modelsresponse)
- |
+| 200 | Successful Response | [ModelsResponse](#modelsresponse) |
+

If we prefer the “leading_only” style, update markdownlint config instead (MD055/MD056/MD058).

Also applies to: 110-116, 117-118, 153-154, 175-176, 212-221, 242-243, 258-259, 294-295, 298-299, 327-328, 331-332, 351-354, 372-375, 396-401


218-218: Wording: “can not” → “cannot”.

Use “cannot” per style guidance.

-| 500 | User feedback can not be stored | [ErrorResponse](#errorresponse) |
+| 500 | User feedback cannot be stored | [ErrorResponse](#errorresponse) |

924-927: Fix typo in ProviderHealthStatus table.

“Optinal” → “Optional”.

-| message |  | Optinal message about the health status |
+| message |  | Optional message about the health status |
docs/openapi.json (3)

1721-1748: ProviderHealthStatus: fix typo and consider stricter schema.

  • Spelling: “Optinal” → “Optional”.
  • The example for message is “ok”; better to show a human message.
  • Optional: add enum for status to align with docs.

Minimal fix:

         "message": {
@@
-            "title": "Message",
-            "description": "Optinal message about the health status",
-            "examples": [
-                "ok"
-            ]
+            "title": "Message",
+            "description": "Optional message about the health status",
+            "examples": [
+                "All systems operational",
+                "Server is unavailable"
+            ]
         }

If you want to enforce allowed statuses:

         "status": {
-            "type": "string",
+            "type": "string",
+            "enum": ["ok", "unhealthy", "not_implemented"],
             "title": "Status",
             "description": "The health status",
             "examples": [
                 "ok",
                 "unhealthy",
                 "not_implemented"
             ]
         },

539-542: DELETE /v1/conversations/{conversation_id} 200 example uses “message” but schema uses “response”.

Align the example key with ConversationDeleteResponse.response.

-                        "message": "Conversation deleted successfully"
+                        "response": "Conversation deleted successfully"

347-347: Wording in error description: “can not” → “cannot”.

Consistency with docs/output.md and general style.

-                        "description": "User feedback can not be stored",
+                        "description": "User feedback cannot be stored",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc50deb and 638b9ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/openapi.json (2 hunks)
  • docs/openapi.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/output.md (13 hunks)
  • src/models/classes.txt (1 hunks)
  • src/models/responses.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/output.md

77-77: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


78-78: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


110-110: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


111-111: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


112-112: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


113-113: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


114-114: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


115-115: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


117-117: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


118-118: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


118-118: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


153-153: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


154-154: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


154-154: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


175-175: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


176-176: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


212-212: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


213-213: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


214-214: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


215-215: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


216-216: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


217-217: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


218-218: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


219-219: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


220-220: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


221-221: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


221-221: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


242-242: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


243-243: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


243-243: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


258-258: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


259-259: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


294-294: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


295-295: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


298-298: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


299-299: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


299-299: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


327-327: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


328-328: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


331-331: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


332-332: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


332-332: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


351-351: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


352-352: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


353-353: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


354-354: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


354-354: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


372-372: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


373-373: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


374-374: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


375-375: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


375-375: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)


396-396: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


397-397: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


398-398: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


399-399: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


400-400: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)


401-401: Table column count
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)


401-401: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

🪛 LanguageTool
docs/output.md

[style] ~218-~218: Unless you want to emphasize “not”, use “cannot” which is more common.
Context: ...iddenresponse) | | 500 | User feedback can not be stored | [ErrorResponse](#errorrespo...

(CAN_NOT_PREMIUM)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-pr
  • GitHub Check: e2e_tests

@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the lcore-390-field-description-for-provider-health-status branch from 638b9ed to 52408e8 Compare August 21, 2025 06:31
@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the lcore-390-field-description-for-provider-health-status branch from 52408e8 to 98a968c Compare August 21, 2025 06:34
@tisnik tisnik merged commit 6ecd1d3 into lightspeed-core:main Aug 21, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant