Better docstring for auth no-op unit test

[tisnik]

Description

Better docstring for auth no-op unit test

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• CVE fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update
• Configuration Update
• Bump-up service version
• Bump-up dependent library
• Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
• CI configuration change
• Konflux configuration change
• Unit tests improvement
• Integration tests improvement
• End to end tests improvement

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Enhanced the docstring of a test to provide a clearer, more detailed explanation of its purpose and expected behavior. No changes to test logic.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A single test function's docstring in the authentication unit tests was expanded from a brief summary to a detailed multi-line explanation. No changes were made to the test logic or assertions; only the documentation for the test was updated.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Test Docstring Update tests/unit/auth/test_noop_with_token.py	Expanded the docstring for the test_noop_with_token_auth_dependency_no_token test function, providing a more detailed explanation of its purpose and assertions. No code or logic changes were made.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• LCORE-303: updated docstrings #230: Expands and improves docstrings for test functions, similar in nature to this PR but applied to different test files.
• LCORE-303: fixed Pylint issues + new config tests #233: Also modifies the same test function, but changes how the awaited call's return values are handled rather than just updating the docstring.

Poem

A docstring grows, its meaning clear,
Explaining tests for all to hear.
No logic changed, just words refined,
For future readers, peace of mind.
A rabbit hops with docs in tow—
The code unchanged, but knowledge grows! 🐇

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e6e5aa and ce44bc6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/unit/auth/test_noop_with_token.py (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• tests/unit/auth/test_noop_with_token.py

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: e2e_tests

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/unit/auth/test_noop_with_token.py (1)

58-62: Wrap docstring to satisfy pylint line length and tighten summary per PEP 257

Current lines 59 and 61 exceed 100 chars (see pipeline warnings). Suggest a concise summary line + wrapped details.

-    """
-    Test that NoopWithTokenAuthDependency raises an HTTPException when no Authorization header is present in the request.
-
-    Asserts that the exception has a status code of 400 and the detail message "No Authorization header found".
-    """
+    """
+    Raises HTTPException if Authorization header is missing.
+
+    Expects:
+    - status_code == 400
+    - detail == "No Authorization header found"
+    """

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d872393 and 3e6e5aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/unit/auth/test_noop_with_token.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 GitHub Actions: Python linter

tests/unit/auth/test_noop_with_token.py

[warning] 59-59: pylint: Line too long (121/100) (line-too-long)

---

[warning] 61-61: pylint: Line too long (111/100) (line-too-long)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: build-pr