-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41.7k
test/e2e: Fix flaking subresource test #116619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test/e2e: Fix flaking subresource test #116619
Conversation
Avoid comparing fields that might end up changing between two invocations of kubectl. Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <[email protected]>
|
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/priority important-soon |
|
/cc @SergeyKanzhelev |
|
/assign @seans3 can you ptal? it maybe late for Maciej Thanks for the quick fix |
SergeyKanzhelev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
straightforward change
/lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 7f6db4d3ba44f93400690799053470bc0a302d94
|
|
/approve |
liggitt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
just to deflake master for code freeze, but I don't think empty strings passed to checkOutput make sense
a follow-up to make this output structured data with -o jsonpath would be more reliable and more correct
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims, liggitt, MadhavJivrajani, SergeyKanzhelev The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind flake
What this PR does / why we need it:
Avoid comparing fields that might end up changing
between two invocations of kubectl.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #116614
Special notes for your reviewer:
I also thought of only comparing the headers, but thought this might be better. Happy to revise the approach.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:
/cc @aojea
/assign @soltysh