Skip to content

Conversation

@gvmw
Copy link
Contributor

@gvmw gvmw commented Dec 1, 2021

This is what most users expect. Without it, the Messaging Topology Operator will not be able to manage objects from a different namespace. The implications are that all Brokers / Triggers / Sinks need to be created in the same namespace as the RabbitmqCluster. This annotation addresses that limitation.

More context:

This is what most users expect. Without this, the Messaging Topology
Operator will not be able to manage objects from a different namespace.
The implications are that all Brokers / Triggers / Sinks need to be
created in the same namespace as the RabbitmqCluster. This annotation
addresses that limitation.

More context:
- knative-extensions/eventing-rabbitmq#454
- rabbitmq/messaging-topology-operator#201

Signed-off-by: Gerhard Lazu <[email protected]>
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Dec 1, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 1, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for knative ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 7e58c4a

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/knative/deploys/61a77bd22781ff000741a321

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-4532--knative.netlify.app/development/eventing/broker/rabbitmq-broker

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 1, 2021
@gvmw
Copy link
Contributor Author

gvmw commented Dec 1, 2021

/assign @snneji

@benmoss
Copy link
Contributor

benmoss commented Dec 1, 2021

/approve
/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2021
@snneji
Copy link
Contributor

snneji commented Dec 1, 2021

/approve

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benmoss, gvmw, snneji

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 1, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit ee7a89f into knative:main Dec 1, 2021
@gvmw gvmw deleted the default-to-single-rabbitmq-cluster-for-eventing-rabbitmq branch December 2, 2021 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants