tar: Fix name filter on Windows

[djdv]

This is for: ipfs/kubo#9370
Specifically this comment for context: ipfs/kubo#9370 (comment)

e579012 is the main fix
In short, this plain-string used to be a regex-string where [ and ] have meaning, they're not part of the set so they should not be used with ContainsAny.

4b9e075
Is a secondary fix that catches reserved names even if their case differs.
I don't know if anyone has encountered this in IPFS yet, but I know file names like con show up in various operating system source trees.

The rest of the patches are gardening and testing.
The sanitize tests hit 100% coverage with this, and I tested this explicitly in go-ipfs via ipfs get.
Prior to the patch, we hit the bug. After, we don't.

> ipfs add -r -w 'T:\Temp\[works on my machine]\'
added QmPFaJjSbNVJxG1PTQYVJAkycHTbsZzBLtJRFCo9BvAgbm [works on my machine]/[works for me].png
added QmeKh8Lq1JKk4LLVc2xuJ5VsCBUgUJ3YXa4Umnkb6Urrih [works on my machine]
added QmaSWjLPmJoPBPtUQ9geGCCvNms5EaNkMS2DzgW5NHbP45

> ipfs-stable get QmaSWjLPmJoPBPtUQ9geGCCvNms5EaNkMS2DzgW5NHbP45
Saving file(s) to QmaSWjLPmJoPBPtUQ9geGCCvNms5EaNkMS2DzgW5NHbP45
Error: invalid platform path: path components cannot contain any of [<>:"\|?*] : "[works on my machine]"

> ipfs-dev get QmaSWjLPmJoPBPtUQ9geGCCvNms5EaNkMS2DzgW5NHbP45
Saving file(s) to QmaSWjLPmJoPBPtUQ9geGCCvNms5EaNkMS2DzgW5NHbP45
 440.79 KiB / 440.79 KiB [=] 100.00% 0s

Probably good?

[welcome]

Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

• The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions
  and stakeholders linked/mentioned.

• Your contribution itself is clear (code comments, self-review for the
  rest) and in its best form. Follow the code contribution
  guidelines
  if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

• A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on
  any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high
  priority items.

• The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.

• The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.80%. Comparing base (0f1ebac) to head (9274bf1).

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1047      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.75%   60.80%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         268      268              
  Lines       33593    33590       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits        20411    20425      +14     
+ Misses      11510    11494      -16     
+ Partials     1672     1671       -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
tar/sanitize_windows.go	100.00% <100.00%> (+39.58%)	⬆️

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[djdv]

I should have drafted this first, too late now.
Gave this a second look and made some minor changes.
I'm content with this, so it should be ready for external review.
Edit: might be best to review commit-by-commit rather than starting with the full-diff. idk