Skip to content

Conversation

@abrown
Copy link
Contributor

@abrown abrown commented Mar 19, 2025

This CI check fails if cargo clippy fails, which is unfortunate since we really want the output of cargo clippy, errors and all, available to the CodeQL action. This change attempts to remedy that by ignoring any error code returned by cargo clippy (and only cargo clippy; we expect the other steps to succeed.

@abrown abrown requested a review from mingqiusun March 19, 2025 00:03
This CI check fails if `cargo clippy` fails, which is unfortunate since
we really want the output of `cargo clippy`, errors and all, available
to the CodeQL action. This change attempts to remedy that by ignoring
any error code returned by `cargo clippy` (and only `cargo clippy`; we
expect the other steps to succeed.
@abrown abrown merged commit 5bcf783 into intel:main Mar 21, 2025
17 checks passed
@abrown abrown deleted the fix-scan branch March 21, 2025 00:48
Copy link

@mingqiusun mingqiusun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants