chore(docs): update Podman/Quadlets instructions link to a more up to date repo

[linux-universe]

Description

While I am thankful to Tbelway for creating instructions, I did not find them to be the most up-to-date or clearly arranged. So I've written my own! ;)

old instructions: https://github.com/tbelway/immich-podman-quadlets/blob/main/docs/install/podman-quadlet.md

mine: https://github.com/linux-universe/immich-podman-quadlets/blob/main/README.md

How Has This Been Tested?

I've tested everything not in the README mentioned as not tested on my own homeserver. On the things I couldn't test because of missing hardware, I took inspiration on Tbelways repo.

• I have an homeserver running openSUSE microos with podman. I successfully tested it with rootful podman on it.

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if applicable
• I have no unrelated changes in the PR.
• I have confirmed that any new dependencies are strictly necessary.
• I have written tests for new code (if applicable)
• I have followed naming conventions/patterns in the surrounding code
• All code in src/services/ uses repositories implementations for database calls, filesystem operations, etc.
• All code in src/repositories/ is pretty basic/simple and does not have any immich specific logic (that belongs in src/services/)

[github-actions]

Label error. Requires exactly 1 of: changelog:.*. Found: documentation. A maintainer will add the required label.

[bo0tzz]

Have you tried contributing to tbelway's repo? I'm hesitant to get into changing out links every time someone thinks it needs improving ;)

[linux-universe]

Have you tried contributing to tbelway's repo? I'm hesitant to get into changing out links every time someone thinks it needs improving ;)

I've thought about it, but since our guides are structured very differently, I don’t think replacing most of someone else’s repository would be the right move.

For example, tbelway uses a single page with all the Quadlet files listed, while I’ve structured mine as individual .container files. Also, tbelway separates the microservices from the main server container, which is totally valid - but my goal is to stay as close as possible to the original Docker Compose setup from Immich. I believe that’s a more familiar and user-friendly approach for most people.

Because of these differences, I don’t think a pull request is the right way forward. Instead, as a compromise, we could rename tbelway’s entry in community-guides.tsx to something like "Podman/Quadlets Install (with separated Microservices)", and add a new entry for my guide: "Immich Podman Quadlet Base (with related wiki guides)"

Update:
Like the original Compose file, my setup aims to be a clean and unopinionated base. I’ve also created a public wiki where the community can build on this base by adding more advanced or opinionated features. So, for example, if someone wants to add OAuth support, instead of creating a whole new guide, they can just add a wiki page that extends the base setup. This way, we keep things organized, clean and expandable. https://github.com/linux-universe/immich-podman-quadlets/wiki