-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
Add evals with Inspect guide to Inference Providers #2036
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
davanstrien
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice! Love the example! Made a few small comments and nit suggestion for language (feel free to ignore!)
pcuenca
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very cool! 🔥
Co-authored-by: Daniel van Strien <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel van Strien <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <[email protected]>
|
great blog post ! Don't know if it's in scope of the blog but lighteval is moving towards using inspect-ai as well. I'm adding a few utilities for comparing and evaluating hf-inference-providers. For example I added |
I had the same thought, not sure if in scope either. Maybe worth adding just a sentence with a link, but your call (of course) @dvsrepo |
@NathanHB, it would be awesome to add a reference/references to lighteval, even at each section (example) level. Would you be open to add some changes, or you prefer I add them? |
|
Added a small line at the end, feel free to rephrase if needed :) |
Great @NathanHB ! I rephrased it a bit and moved it to the second bullet point, let me know if the working seems right to you |
|
we're all set from my side, thanks a lot for the reviews @pcuenca @davanstrien @NathanHB ! |
No description provided.