Tool Comparison #13
Draft
Tool Comparison #13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…solution tools Compare dependency-resolver against popular SBOM tools (syft, trivy) for runtime production environment scanning requirements. Analysis covers 5 different approaches for Docker container scanning, highlighting unique capabilities like direct container execution and Docker Compose image hash extraction. Includes ecosystem overview covering GitHub, GitLab, Microsoft sbom-tool, and Tern for context. Recommends continuing dependency-resolver development due to runtime scanning gaps in existing tools and significant engineering effort required for sidecar approaches. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Extends TECHNICAL_COMPARISON_REPORT.md with detailed analysis of: - Tool strategy (dependency-resolver): direct package manager queries - Lock file strategy (syft/trivy): static file and metadata parsing - Runtime vs static detection differences with concrete examples - Production environment drift considerations - Performance and resource implications - Strategic decision matrix for runtime container scanning Highlights dependency-resolver's advantage for capturing true runtime state including packages installed after container startup, versus static analysis limitations in detecting runtime modifications. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
- Merged scanning approach and package manager coverage sections - Streamlined hash retrieval examples with essential code only - Condensed output format comparison to key differences - Consolidated lengthy tool vs lock file strategy section into focused comparison table - Removed duplicate JSON examples and repetitive explanations - Reduced report length by ~40% while preserving all critical technical insights 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Add links for first mention only of key tools and standards: - SPDX, CycloneDX standards documentation - GitHub, GitLab platform links - syft, trivy, sbom-tool, tern project repositories Following standard documentation practice of linking only initial occurrences. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #6
Marked as draft, because