- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 143
 
Add support for forks #88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Open
      
      
            ojarjur
  wants to merge
  40
  commits into
  master
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
ojarjur/forks
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: master
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
                
     Open
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    This change is the first step in making `git-appraise` support the concept of `forks`: remote repositories used by contributors who cannot push to the main repository. This initial change only adds the user documentation around forks. This allows us to scope out the feature while making sure that the end user experience is simple, consistent, and complete. Later commits will add tests and implement the new feature.
…ith the `request` reviewer flag
…ork when there are no changes to a fork
b7fdb3f    to
    4f4956c      
    Compare
  
    
    
  ojarjur 
      added a commit
        to google/distributed-git-forks
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 13, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
This repository implements distributed tracking and management of git forks by storing the list of forks in the repository itself. The idea behind this was first proposed as a feature of [`git-appraise`](google/git-appraise#88), but is being split out into a standalone feature after it became clear that the functionality was useful in more contexts than just for code review.
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
This change adds the concept of "forks" to git-appraise.
The underlying idea is that each contributor can have their own personal repository to which they push, and that the overarching repository can be viewed as a compilation of those separate repositories.
In essence, we are adding symbolic links to other repositories inside the repo itself, and then resolving those links on the client side.
Each entry in this collection of symbolic links is what we call a "fork", and the collection includes all of the information that a client needs to know how to fetch from each fork and which notes should be merged from each fork.
By doing this, we unlock the ability to perform reviews across multiple remote repositories, and even entirely separate hosting providers.
For example, one contributor could have a repository that they push to on GitHub, another can have one on GitLab, and a third could have one stored in GitTorrent, and all three could push to their respective repositories while reviewing code from each other.
This fixes #71