Skip to content

Conversation

jf205
Copy link
Contributor

@jf205 jf205 commented Feb 13, 2020

Related to #2829 (and partially fixes https://github.com/github/product-documentation/issues/2188).

I've moved Monotonic aggregates in QL into the QL language handbook, so that we can remove the 'Advanced QL' section altogether before we move any of the CodeQL docs.

@alexet: I've tried to simplify the content into couple of bullet points, but I've left in the full example for the recursive use. Please can you review the changes?

After this is merged I'll open a separate PR to do the final bits of tidying up of Advanced QL.

@jf205 jf205 requested a review from shati-patel as a code owner February 13, 2020 18:14
@jf205 jf205 requested a review from alexet February 13, 2020 18:15
@jf205
Copy link
Contributor Author

jf205 commented Feb 14, 2020

@jf205
Copy link
Contributor Author

jf205 commented Feb 17, 2020

@alexet over to you for a technical review please

value for each value generated by the ``<formula>``:

- If there are missing ``<expression>`` values (that is, there is less than one
``<expression>`` value for each value generated by the ``<formula>``), monotonic aggregates
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be something like "for a value generated by the <formula>" otherwise it reads to me like every value must be missing in this case.

"there is less than one <expression>" might be simpler as "there is no <expression>" as the numbers here are natural numbers.

@alexet alexet merged commit c685b34 into github:master Feb 17, 2020
@jf205 jf205 deleted the monotonic-aggregates branch March 17, 2020 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants