Skip to content

Conversation

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

Not using plain strings, but always use SPANDATA. Follow up to this PR: #4373

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.37%. Comparing base (bf0393b) to head (f48910a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on potel-base.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           potel-base    #4376   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage       84.37%   84.37%           
===========================================
  Files             144      144           
  Lines           14691    14697    +6     
  Branches         2339     2339           
===========================================
+ Hits            12395    12401    +6     
  Misses           1567     1567           
  Partials          729      729           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
sentry_sdk/ai/monitoring.py 88.73% <100.00%> (ø)
sentry_sdk/consts.py 99.59% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

@antonpirker antonpirker marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 09:35
@antonpirker antonpirker requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2025 09:35
Copy link
Member

@szokeasaurusrex szokeasaurusrex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did notice that there are fewer files changed here than in #4373 – I'm assuming these files don't exist in POTel?

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor Author

the other changes have already been made in the other PR. this one just adds the new occurences of not using SPANDATA that have been introduced in potel.

@antonpirker antonpirker merged commit 07ba0f0 into potel-base May 9, 2025
123 checks passed
@antonpirker antonpirker deleted the antonpirker/potel/spandata-consistency branch May 9, 2025 09:44
Copy link
Member

ah got it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants