Skip to content

Conversation

@gnikit
Copy link
Member

@gnikit gnikit commented May 16, 2023

I think the signature is still not ideal
i.e. LOGICAL FUNCTION but I chose it
since it indicates that the associate block
variable is the result of a function.

Fixes #269

I think the signature is still not ideal
i.e. `LOGICAL FUNCTION` but I chose it
since it indicates that the associate block
variable is the result of a function.

Fixes #269
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #280 (59f4402) into master (eb6f618) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #280   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.94%   86.95%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        4566     4569    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         3970     3973    +3     
  Misses        596      596           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
fortls/objects.py 83.99% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
fortls/parse_fortran.py 89.10% <100.00%> (ø)

@gnikit gnikit merged commit 6a82432 into master May 16, 2023
@gnikit gnikit deleted the gnikit/issue269 branch May 16, 2023 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: Error hovering an associated function

2 participants