Skip to content

Conversation

@flow-tech
Copy link
Contributor

@flow-tech flow-tech commented Oct 7, 2025

About this PR

Updates:

  • 📦 io.flow:lib-test-utils-play29 from 0.2.77 to 0.2.79
  • 📦 io.flow:sbt-flow-linter from 0.0.70 to 0.0.71

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add these to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of these dependencies:

updates.ignore = [
  { groupId = "io.flow", artifactId = "lib-test-utils-play29" },
  { groupId = "io.flow", artifactId = "sbt-flow-linter" }
]

Or, add these to slow down future updates of these dependencies:

dependencyOverrides = [
  {
    pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
    dependency = { groupId = "io.flow", artifactId = "lib-test-utils-play29" }
  },
  {
    pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
    dependency = { groupId = "io.flow", artifactId = "sbt-flow-linter" }
  }
]
labels: scala-steward

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Updated the testing library to the latest patch version to keep the test suite current and stable.
  • Chores

    • Upgraded the build linting plugin to the latest patch release to maintain alignment with tooling updates.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 7, 2025 04:32
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request updates Flow-related dependencies in the project, specifically upgrading library versions for better compatibility and bug fixes.

  • Updates lib-test-utils-play29 from version 0.2.77 to 0.2.79
  • Updates sbt-flow-linter plugin from version 0.0.70 to 0.0.71

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 7, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated a test-scoped dependency in build.sbt and bumped the sbt-flow-linter plugin version in project/plugins.sbt. No source code changes or public API alterations.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Test dependency bump
build.sbt
Updated "io.flow" %% "lib-test-utils-play29" from 0.2.77 to 0.2.79 in Test scope.
SBT plugin bump
project/plugins.sbt
Updated sbt-flow-linter plugin from 0.0.70 to 0.0.71.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jackl
  • github-actions

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “Flow dependency updates” succinctly captures the main change of bumping two io.flow dependencies and aligns with the PR’s focus on updating Flow libraries without introducing extraneous details.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c993894 and 9ab1f1b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • build.sbt (1 hunks)
  • project/plugins.sbt (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Jenkins

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 1bb3d97 into main Oct 7, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the update/flow branch October 7, 2025 04:34
@flow-tech
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants