Skip to content

Conversation

donny-dont
Copy link

Instead of using oneOf with two different object types just combine it into one definition.

Instead of using `oneOf` with two different object types just combine it into one definition.
@donny-dont
Copy link
Author

To me this seems like a better way to define it since both of the definitions had an endpointNodeId and just either a position or magnet field.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant