Skip to content

Conversation

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

@gaearon gaearon commented Dec 8, 2017

Nothing super important, just noticed we don't cover some of the existing behavior which might be a bit odd, but it existed since 16.0. So we shouldn't break it refactoring that code.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gaearon commented Dec 8, 2017

(In particular, the fact that custom attributes aren't subject to any restrictions in our logic whatsoever right now.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants