Skip to content

Conversation

@holiman
Copy link
Contributor

@holiman holiman commented Feb 14, 2023

This is an alternative to #26686. Seems like #26686 throws the baby out with the bathwater.

ps: haven't tested yet

@s1na
Copy link
Contributor

s1na commented Feb 14, 2023

Ah you were faster than me. I was testing an alternative with atomic.Value.

@holiman
Copy link
Contributor Author

holiman commented Feb 14, 2023

I was testing an alternative with atomic.Value.

Yeah that be less of a hack, tbh. You can probably make that look nicer than what I did

@s1na
Copy link
Contributor

s1na commented Feb 14, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants