🚧 wip(test): EIP-7928: Block-level Access Lists

[raxhvl]

🗒️ Description

🚧 wip tests for EIP-7928.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx --with=tox-uv tox -e lint,typecheck,spellcheck,markdownlint

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered adding an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
• Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.
• Tests: For PRs implementing a missed test case, update the post-mortem document to add an entry the list.

[marioevz]

It would be nice to have an update to https://github.com/ethereum/execution-spec-tests/blob/main/src/ethereum_test_fixtures/blockchain.py where we plan to include the BAL in the pydantic model to both the blockchain and blockchain-engine tests, to have a better idea on how this ends up in the fixture.

[marioevz]

Another qs is whether the t8n should generate the BAL.

[raxhvl]

Another qs is whether the t8n should generate the BAL.

Yes t8n should generate BAL independently during execution verify against the from these tests.

[raxhvl]

Superseded by #2067