Skip to content

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented May 12, 2024

No description provided.

@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this May 12, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this May 12, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this May 20, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this May 20, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this May 26, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this May 26, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this Jun 16, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this Jun 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from 567ecb7 to 5319bb6 Compare July 21, 2024 01:40
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from de7284f to f0f305e Compare August 18, 2024 01:41
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this Aug 19, 2024
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this Aug 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from 2cee856 to 1b026a7 Compare September 8, 2024 01:48
@liesnikov
Copy link

liesnikov commented Jun 6, 2025

edit: wait, nevermind, I was confused about the runs - you are right and the x64 runs also failed there

If you look at the CI run in this repo this seems to be the differentiating factor. But it wouldn't explain why the one in my repo succeeded - that run is on x64 and it did succeed.
It was triggered manually, but I don't see anything in the action file where that would make a difference.

@liesnikov
Copy link

Not sure how to make sense of the local succeeding tests though.
I am on Debian 12 with x86_64 CPU, the project shell with dependencies was constructed via nix.

@jcs090218
Copy link
Member

My best guess is that the environment differs slightly—either due to Nix or GitHub Actions. 🤔

@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from c8fa53f to 4e0c8f4 Compare June 22, 2025 02:23
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this Jun 29, 2025
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this Jun 29, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from 8d38a24 to 735792f Compare July 6, 2025 08:31
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this Jul 7, 2025
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this Jul 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from 61f3fad to 0ea3885 Compare August 10, 2025 02:30
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from cc8e886 to cbc813d Compare August 24, 2025 02:12
@jcs090218 jcs090218 closed this Aug 31, 2025
@jcs090218 jcs090218 reopened this Aug 31, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from c312bdd to 303ee64 Compare September 14, 2025 02:00
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the bump-haskell branch 2 times, most recently from 14bd62e to 93e1dc6 Compare October 5, 2025 02:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants