Improve API Error Handling #169
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughAdds ProblemDetails and status code pages middleware, uses environment-specific exception handling, sets ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Production in the Docker final image and adds a Production launch profile, and updates functional tests including environment-specific WebApplicationFactory classes and ProblemDetails-based assertions. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant Pipeline as MiddlewarePipeline
participant DevPage as DeveloperExceptionPage
participant Problem as ProblemDetails
Client->>API: HTTP request
API->>Pipeline: invoke middleware
Pipeline->>Pipeline: StatusCodePages active
alt Environment is Development and exception occurs
Pipeline->>DevPage: UseDeveloperExceptionPage
DevPage-->>Client: HTML diagnostic page
else Environment is Production and exception occurs
Pipeline->>Problem: Generate ProblemDetails JSON
Problem-->>Client: ProblemDetails JSON (status,title,type)
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (1)
48-48: LGTM! ProblemDetails middleware registered correctly.The registration enables standardized RFC 7807 error responses. The default configuration is appropriate and integrates well with the exception handling middleware added below.
For future enhancement, consider customizing ProblemDetails to include additional metadata:
-builder.Services.AddProblemDetails(); +builder.Services.AddProblemDetails(options => +{ + options.CustomizeProblemDetails = context => + { + context.ProblemDetails.Extensions["traceId"] = context.HttpContext.TraceIdentifier; + // Add other custom fields as needed + }; +});
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Dockerfile(1 hunks)src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs(2 hunks)src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Properties/launchSettings.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (1)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Auth/AuthExtensions.cs (1)
UseAuth(26-30)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: CodeQL analysis (csharp)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Dockerfile (1)
29-29: LGTM! Production environment configured correctly.Setting the environment to Production in the Docker image ensures that the exception handling middleware will use the sanitized error responses configured in Program.cs rather than exposing detailed error information.
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Properties/launchSettings.json (1)
11-18: LGTM! Valuable addition for testing production behavior locally.The new launch profile enables developers to test the production exception handling configuration (ProblemDetails responses, UseExceptionHandler) without deploying to a production environment.
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (2)
143-150: LGTM! Environment-specific exception handling configured correctly.The implementation properly separates development and production error handling:
- Development gets detailed exception pages for debugging
- Production uses the ProblemDetails middleware (registered on line 48) to return sanitized, standardized error responses
The parameterless
UseExceptionHandler()call correctly integrates with the ProblemDetails middleware.
152-152: LGTM! Status code pages middleware properly positioned.The middleware will generate ProblemDetails responses for HTTP status codes (404, 401, etc.) and is correctly placed after exception handling but before routing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds explicit environment configuration and exception handling middleware to the API. The changes ensure proper error handling behavior based on the environment (Development vs Production) and provide a new launch profile for local testing in Production mode.
- Added environment-aware exception handling middleware (developer exception page for Development, standard exception handler for Production)
- Added ProblemDetails support and status code pages middleware
- Created a new launch profile "Local (Production)" for testing production behavior locally
- Explicitly set ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Production in Dockerfile
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Properties/launchSettings.json | Added "Local (Production)" launch profile for testing production environment locally |
| src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs | Added environment-aware exception handling middleware, ProblemDetails service, and status code pages middleware |
| src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Dockerfile | Explicitly set ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT to Production in the final Docker image |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs (1)
82-90: Excellent validation of ProblemDetails response format.The test correctly validates the structured error response, checking Status, Title, and Type properties. The use of existing JsonSerializerOptions and consistent Shouldly assertions is good practice.
Consider adding Content-Type header validation to ensure the API returns the correct media type:
challenge.Parameter.ShouldContain("BREEF-API-KEY"); + response.Content.Headers.ContentType?.MediaType.ShouldBe("application/problem+json"); + var responseString = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Necessary import for ProblemDetails.The new using directive is required for the ProblemDetails type used in the test assertions.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
…/breef into improve-api-error-handling
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs(2 hunks)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (1)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Auth/AuthExtensions.cs (1)
UseAuth(26-30)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs (1)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (1)
Task(26-163)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (3)
48-48: LGTM: ProblemDetails middleware registered correctly.The registration of ProblemDetails services is standard and appropriate for structured error responses conforming to RFC 7807.
152-152: Verify middleware ordering forUseStatusCodePages.
UseStatusCodePages()is positioned before authentication/authorization middleware. This ordering may prevent proper ProblemDetails formatting for authentication failures (401) and authorization failures (403). Typically, status code pages middleware should be positioned after auth middleware or may not be needed at all since ProblemDetails middleware handles status code formatting automatically.Consider one of these approaches:
- Remove
UseStatusCodePages()if ProblemDetails middleware alone provides sufficient error formatting- Move it after
UseAuth()if explicit status code page handling is requiredTest whether 401/403 responses are properly formatted with the current ordering.
157-158: LGTM: Health endpoint configured correctly.The health endpoint mapping and
.AllowAnonymous()call are properly formatted and configured.tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs (2)
3-3: LGTM: Required using statement added.The
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvcnamespace is correctly added forProblemDetailstype usage.
81-95: ProblemDetails validation logic is sound.The assertions properly verify RFC 7807 ProblemDetails format for unauthorized responses: content-type, status code, title, and type URI. However, this validation is only effective once the environment configuration issue (Line 71) is resolved.
Note: Different environments may produce different
ProblemDetailscontent (e.g., Development might include additional debug information). Verify that both environments return consistent fields that the test asserts on, or adjust assertions to be environment-aware.
…xcetion page" This reverts commit 4b34d4b.
…as development excetion page
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeDevelopment.cs (1)
12-17: Critical: Environment variable setting doesn't affect the WebApplicationFactory.Setting
ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENTat Line 14 has no effect on the injectedWebApplicationFactory<Program>. The factory's environment is determined when xUnit creates it (before the constructor runs), not during test initialization. The test will not actually run in Development environment as intended.Apply this diff to properly configure the environment:
public HealthTestsNativeDevelopment(WebApplicationFactory<Program> webAppFactory) { - Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT", "Development"); - _webApplicationFactory = webAppFactory; + _webApplicationFactory = webAppFactory.WithWebHostBuilder(builder => + { + builder.UseEnvironment("Development"); + }); _client = _webApplicationFactory.CreateClient(); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeProduction.cs (1)
2-2: Optional: Remove unused System import after applying the fix.After applying the suggested fix to the constructor (removing
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable), theSystemnamespace import will no longer be needed and can be removed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs(2 hunks)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeDevelopment.cs(1 hunks)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeProduction.cs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeProduction.cs (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsBase.cs (1)
HealthTestsBase(7-34)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeDevelopment.cs (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsBase.cs (1)
HealthTestsBase(7-34)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs (2)
3-3: LGTM: Required using for ProblemDetails.The addition of
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvcnamespace is necessary to support the new ProblemDetails validation logic.
82-90: LGTM: Comprehensive ProblemDetails validation.The test correctly validates that unauthorized responses now return ProblemDetails with appropriate status, title, and type fields. This aligns well with the PR objective of improving API error handling.
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNativeProduction.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
10-10: Fix indentation for consistency.The line lacks proper indentation compared to the surrounding code.
Apply this diff:
-builder.UseEnvironment("Production"); + builder.UseEnvironment("Production");tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (3)
13-16: Fix indentation for consistency.Line 14 has an extra space before the opening brace.
Apply this diff:
- public HealthTestsNative(ITestOutputHelper output) - { + public HealthTestsNative(ITestOutputHelper output) + {
31-34: Consider removing unnecessary baseUrl constant.The
baseUrlconstant may be unnecessary, asCreateClient()typically configures the base address automatically. You can likely simplify toawait client.GetAsync("/health").If the current approach works, consider this diff:
- using var client = factory.CreateClient(); - const string baseUrl = "http://localhost"; - - // Act - var response = await client.GetAsync($"{baseUrl}/health"); + using var client = factory.CreateClient(); + + // Act + var response = await client.GetAsync("/health");
43-46: Consider extracting shared HealthResponse type.The
HealthResponseclass appears similar to the one inHealthTestsBase.cs(lines 29-32). If both are identical, consider extracting it to a shared location to reduce duplication. However, keeping separate copies may be acceptable if test isolation is preferred.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs(1 hunks)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs(1 hunks)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
ConfigureWebHost(8-11)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
ConfigureWebHost(8-11)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (4)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory(6-12)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
ProductionWebApplicationFactory(6-12)src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (2)
Program(19-178)Program(21-24)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsBase.cs (1)
HealthResponse(30-33)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
6-11: LGTM! Clean test factory implementation.The factory correctly configures the Production environment for functional testing and mirrors the Development factory pattern.
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
6-11: LGTM! Well-structured test factory.The factory correctly configures the Development environment for functional testing with consistent formatting.
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (2)
18-22: Verify factory disposal in test data provider.The data provider creates new factory instances for each test execution. Ensure that xUnit properly disposes of these
WebApplicationFactoryinstances, as they implementIDisposable. If disposal issues arise, consider usingIClassFixtureor implementingIDisposableon the test class to manage factory lifecycle explicitly.
24-41: Well-structured parameterized test!The test effectively validates the health endpoint across both Development and Production environments using xUnit's Theory/MemberData pattern. The logging with
ITestOutputHelperaids debugging, and the assertions properly validate both status code and response body structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (2)
34-37: Remove unnecessary baseUrl constant.The
HttpClientreturned byfactory.CreateClient()is already configured with the appropriate base address. You can use a relative path directly.Apply this diff:
using var client = factory.CreateClient(); - const string baseUrl = "http://localhost"; // Act - var response = await client.GetAsync($"{baseUrl}/health"); + var response = await client.GetAsync("/health");
14-14: Fix inconsistent indentation.Several lines have inconsistent indentation with extra spaces. Consider running a code formatter to ensure consistent formatting throughout the file.
Lines affected: 14, 31, 32, 37, 41, 43, 48.
Also applies to: 31-32, 37-37, 41-41, 43-43, 48-48
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs(2 hunks)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (4)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (2)
Program(19-178)Program(21-24)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory(6-12)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
ProductionWebApplicationFactory(6-12)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsBase.cs (1)
HealthResponse(30-33)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (2)
11-16: LGTM!Standard xUnit pattern for capturing test output.
46-49: LGTM!Simple DTO for deserializing the health check response. The property name casing difference from the endpoint (lowercase "status" in Program.cs vs capital "Status" here) is handled correctly by .NET's case-insensitive JSON deserialization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (1)
31-34: Remove unnecessary baseUrl constant.The
WebApplicationFactory.CreateClient()method returns anHttpClientthat's already configured with a base address pointing to the test server. ThebaseUrlconstant is redundant and potentially confusing.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- using var client = factory.CreateClient(); - const string baseUrl = "http://localhost"; - + using var client = factory.CreateClient(); + // Act - var response = await client.GetAsync($"{baseUrl}/health"); + var response = await client.GetAsync("/health");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (4)
src/Elzik.Breef.Api/Program.cs (2)
Program(19-178)Program(21-24)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
DevelopmentWebApplicationFactory(6-12)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/ProductionWebApplicationFactory.cs (1)
ProductionWebApplicationFactory(6-12)tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsBase.cs (1)
HealthResponse(30-33)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/HealthTestsNative.cs (3)
11-16: LGTM!Standard xUnit test constructor pattern for capturing test output.
26-30: Excellent fix for the resource leak!The
usingstatements for both the factory and client properly address the resource leak issue flagged in the previous review. Both disposable resources will now be cleaned up at test completion.
43-46: LGTM!Simple and appropriate DTO for deserializing the health endpoint response.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Elzik.Breef.sln(0 hunks)tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.http(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Elzik.Breef.sln
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build-ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
| BREEF-API-KEY: test-key | ||
| { | ||
| "url":"https://www.positive.news/society/swiping-less-living-more-how-to-take-control-of-our-digital-lives/" | ||
| "url":"https://www.168716871687168716positive.news/society/swiping-less-living-more-how-to-take-control-of-our-digital-lives/" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Clarify the purpose of this invalid URL in a sample requests file.
The URL has been changed to an invalid/unreachable domain (168716871687168716positive.news). While this may be intentional for testing error handling scenarios given the PR's focus, sample request files typically contain valid, working examples for developers to reference and execute.
If this is meant to test error handling:
- Consider moving this to a proper test file (e.g., functional tests) rather than sample requests
- The AI summary indicates functional tests were updated with environment-specific factories, which would be a more appropriate location
- If keeping it here, add a comment explaining this is intentionally invalid for error testing
If this change was unintentional, please revert to the original valid URL.
Can you confirm whether this URL change was intentional? If it's for testing error scenarios, would it be better placed in the functional test suite?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the full file content to understand context
echo "=== Full file content ==="
cat tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.http
echo -e "\n=== File metadata ==="
wc -l tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.httpLength of output: 865
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other invalid URLs or error test patterns in sample/test files
echo "=== Searching for other potentially invalid/test URLs ==="
rg -n "168716|invalid|localhost|error.*url" tests/ --type http --type json -C 2
echo -e "\n=== Checking for ProblemDetails or error handling tests ==="
fd -e cs -e json . tests/ | head -20 | xargs grep -l "ProblemDetails\|error.*test" 2>/dev/null | head -5Length of output: 204
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check git diff to understand intent of this change
echo "=== Git diff context for the changed file ==="
git diff HEAD -- tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.http 2>/dev/null || echo "Git diff not available"
echo -e "\n=== Checking recent commits affecting this file ==="
git log -n 3 --oneline -- tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.http 2>/dev/null || echo "Git log not available"Length of output: 185
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for functional tests structure mentioned in AI summary
echo "=== Searching for functional tests with error handling ==="
fd -type f -name "*.cs" tests/ -path "*functional*" -o -path "*test*" 2>/dev/null | head -10
echo -e "\n=== Looking for error scenario tests ==="
rg -n "Invalid|Error|Exception" tests/ --type cs -l 2>/dev/null | grep -i test | head -5Length of output: 454
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine functional test structure to see how errors are tested
echo "=== Checking BreefTestsBase.cs for error handling patterns ==="
cat tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs | head -100
echo -e "\n=== Looking for error/exception assertions in functional tests ==="
rg -n "Assert|throw|catch|invalid|error" tests/Elzik.Breef.Api.Tests.Functional/BreefTestsBase.cs -C 2 | head -40Length of output: 5012
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the invalid URL appears in actual test data
echo "=== Search for the invalid domain pattern in test files ==="
rg -rn "168716" . 2>/dev/null
echo -e "\n=== Search for where URLs are being tested ==="
rg -n "url.*test\|test.*url\|invalid.*url" tests/ --type cs -i | head -10Length of output: 269
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the PR or branch information to understand context
echo "=== Checking if this is test data generation or intentional ==="
rg -rn "positive.news" . 2>/dev/null | head -5
echo -e "\n=== Look for original valid URL to understand change ==="
git log -p -- tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.http 2>/dev/null | head -80 || echo "Could not get git history"Length of output: 281
Revert the corrupted URL to its valid form.
The URL on line 9 has been corrupted with a numeric prefix (168716871687168716) making the domain invalid and unreachable. This appears to be accidental data corruption rather than intentional error-testing, as:
- The other 3 sample requests in the file use valid, working URLs
- Functional tests use proper test URLs (example.com) when testing error scenarios
- No pattern of intentional invalid URLs exists elsewhere in the test suite
- Sample request files should demonstrate valid usage for developers
Restore the URL to its original valid form: https://www.positive.news/society/swiping-less-living-more-how-to-take-control-of-our-digital-lives/
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In tests/SampleRequests/Elzik.Breef.Api.http around line 9, the request URL has
been corrupted by an inserted numeric prefix making the domain invalid; replace
the malformed URL "https://www.168716871687168716positive.news/..." with the
correct, valid URL
"https://www.positive.news/society/swiping-less-living-more-how-to-take-control-of-our-digital-lives/"
so the sample request points to a real site and restores the file to a usable
example for developers.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores