Skip to content

Conversation

@marcmo
Copy link
Contributor

@marcmo marcmo commented Nov 6, 2025

originates from CR #136656

}
}

EepromDriver::~EepromDriver() { deinit(); }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this a questionable asymmetry with virtual init() called directly from the StaticBsp while deinit() is called from this destructor?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have addressed this, please have a look.
Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor

@christian-schilling christian-schilling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are several issues with the commit message:

  • The subject should give a hint on what the bug was
  • The body should use correct english grammar including capitalisation and punctuation
  • There should not be a Change-Id: footer

@amit-warbhe amit-warbhe force-pushed the cr-136656 branch 3 times, most recently from 0cb1a38 to 43872f8 Compare November 18, 2025 09:16
…r closed

	FD was never closed, added explicit call to cleanup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants