Skip to content

Conversation

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm commented May 10, 2022

@jfgrimm jfgrimm added the update label May 10, 2022
@jfgrimm jfgrimm changed the title {numlib,toolchain}[iimpi/2022.05,system/system] iimpi v2022.05, imkl-FFTW v2022.1.0 {numlib,toolchain}[iimpi/2022.05,system/system] iimpi v2022.05, imkl-FFTW v2022.1.0, intel v2022.05 May 10, 2022
@boegelbot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
zen2-ubuntu-eb - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.10.4
See https://gist.github.com/458fbe22a72e9dc2ab7e922d2f51b30c for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=15485 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15485 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 1191

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1123321692 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u36b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d9db7731a17d5e57bedf36f310467b6d for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/075f0803d1fa7d3947c9e11d8ab1cb28 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u08b.bear.cluster - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.8.5
See https://gist.github.com/0531bfd022bb3b5f638591d6c77eb19d for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/40db73dc1845740c0ed492d6ce27e173 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=15485 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15485 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8529

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1123333698 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/43be67f921035ee1bed12c6fa72d6e14 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @jfgrimm!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit eda479a into easybuilders:develop May 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants