-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Update Source-Build SDK Diff Tests Baselines and Exclusions #41929
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
929cf1f
9065ad7
b208803
41265a5
5bb1aec
7cfe46e
a08702a
cadd4f8
6d09bd1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,8 +3,10 @@ index ------------ | |
| --- a/msftSdkFiles.txt | ||
| +++ b/sbSdkFiles.txt | ||
| @@ ------------ @@ | ||
| ./host/fxr/ | ||
| ./host/fxr/x.y.z/ | ||
| ./host/fxr/x.y.z/libhostfxr.so | ||
| +./library-packs/ | ||
|
||
| ./LICENSE.txt | ||
| +./metadata/ | ||
| +./metadata/workloads/ | ||
|
|
@@ -44,6 +46,14 @@ index ------------ | |
| ./packs/Microsoft.NETCore.App.Ref/ | ||
| ./packs/Microsoft.NETCore.App.Ref/x.y.z/ | ||
| ./packs/Microsoft.NETCore.App.Ref/x.y.z/analyzers/ | ||
| @@ ------------ @@ | ||
| ./sdk-manifests/ | ||
| ./sdk-manifests/x.y.z/ | ||
| ./sdk-manifests/x.y.z/ | ||
| -./sdk-manifests/x.y.z/ | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The microsoft sdk has the following content in
The source-build sdk has the following content in
@MiYanni - Do you know if this is expected? Is the microsoft sdk supposed to have the preview 1 manifests?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry, but I don't actually know the composition of the SDK. @marcpopMSFT Does that look like it makes sense?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This comes from here and is used in BundledManifests.targets. This should definitely get updated to the latest, i.e. https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Maui.Manifest-9.0.100-preview.5/9.0.0-preview.5.24307.10#readme-body-tab The last time this was done was in dotnet/installer#18693.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These always lag behind 1 release, as we want publicly listed packages. There is kind of a circular dependency here, .NET SDK -> MAUI -> .NET SDK. So, when .NET 9 GAs, we'll probably have .NET 9 RC 2 manifests in here. We could update it now, though: it's been a while.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why are we currently lagging 5 preview releases behind? I assume there is no automated process in place that makes sure those get updated? And what's the customer impact here?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not aware of any customer impact. I suppose you wouldn't get the latest workloads if you used the To automate this, we might be able to use the same Maestro subscription that this repo will be using:
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @ellahathaway if the source-build SDK doesn't contain maui workloads, then the missing @jonathanpeppers can you please file an issue in dotnet/sdk? We should probably also get the manifest updated from P1 to P5.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good. I think the best course of action here is to add this diff to the baseline. I'll update this PR accordingly.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just opened a PR with the builds that shipped yesterday: |
||
| ./sdk-manifests/x.y.z/microsoft.net.sdk.aspire/ | ||
| ./sdk-manifests/x.y.z/microsoft.net.sdk.aspire/x.y.z/ | ||
| ./sdk-manifests/x.y.z/microsoft.net.sdk.aspire/x.y.z/WorkloadManifest.Aspire.targets | ||
| @@ ------------ @@ | ||
| ./sdk/x.y.z/Microsoft.Build.NuGetSdkResolver.dll | ||
| ./sdk/x.y.z/Microsoft.Build.Tasks.Core.dll | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.